I hadn't really considered the varying effectiveness of sunscreens - they all seemed to keep me from burning or getting too much sun (except for an unfortunate day on the ski-slopes where I used an old sunscreen from the trunk of my car. Heat and age *do* impact a sunscreen's effectiveness!)
I usually alternate between spf15 (everyday) and spf45 (beach/golf). Then I heard a news story that some group was stating that any spf higher than 30 is irrelevant and should be labeled 30+, which made me realize that I should spend a little time trying to become more sunscreen-literate.
UVB rays can cause sunburns. UVA rays can cause wrinkles and skin cancer. The SPF number refers to protection against UVB light and not UVA. The FDA is considering adding a new 'star' rating indicating how well the sunscreen protects against UVA rays, you can read the details from the FDA website here.
In the meantime, here's what I learned:
- Not all sunscreens are equally effective across UVA and UVB, even if they indicate they are 'broad-spectrum'.
- Sunscreens that indicate 'broad-spectrum' or 'UVA protection' may or may not provide protection against both long- and short-wave UVA rays.
- The sunscreens with the 'Skin Cancer' seal of approval have paid a one-time fee plus an ongoing yearly fee to be eligible for consideration. So, not having the seal does not necessarily mean the sunscreen is ineffective.
- The sunscreens with the 'American Cancer Society' seal of approval is not based on their effectiveness - the seal is to indicate that the company donates money each year to cancer research.
Helpful links:
- Consumer Reports (subscription required)
- NYTimes article on the sunscreen seals.